With the cancer recurrences of Elizabeth Edwards and Tony Snow the question arises: Why does this still happen? As is often the case, the answer isn’t very satisfying: not all cancers are alike, early detection doesn’t always work and treatments are still far from perfect.

But there’s another problem: we keep focusing on doing the same thing better rather than trying something new. It is as if we are wearing blinders that let us see only one path and not the alternatives.

If you look at most cancer research journals you will see that our focus remains on finding smaller cancers, doing less surgery and radiation and developing new drugs to add to the old ones in an attempt to treat the cancers we detect. This approach—finding the enemy, and then slashing, burning and poisoning it—hasn’t changed since I was a resident in training 30 years ago. We have certainly refined it over the years—two publications just came out that recommended expanding the use of M.R.I. scans in women who have breast cancer or are at risk for it—but, as in this situation where the additional exam only identified 3 percent more cancers, each progressive development leads to a smaller increment in benefit.

Why do we lack new approaches? One of the key problems is the way research on cancer is carried out. In the past it was common for clinicians to observe their patients, come up with a hypothesis regarding diagnosis or treatment and then head to the lab to test it out. For instance, in 1983, two Australian clinicians—one was a pathologist, the other a gastroenterologist—observed bacteria in stomach biopsies and went on to prove that ulcers were caused not by acid, as had been assumed, but by a bacterial infection. Ulcer researchers, who had spent their careers studying gastric acid, thought the idea was absurd but much to their amazement it turned out to be true.

The curious clinician is becoming increasingly rare. Medicine and science have become so complicated that it is almost impossible for one person to be an expert at both. Researchers tend to take a discovery from the lab and apply it to patients; the reverse trip is more and more uncommon. More often than not, someone makes an interesting discovery in the lab and then tries to find a clinical application. There is little chance, much less financing, for the wild idea that might prove revolutionary.

This situation is not helped by the incentives we give to young cancer researchers but not to experienced clinicians who want to test a hypothesis developed over years of treating patients. It is difficult indeed to obtain a grant to do research if you haven’t spent your career in the laboratory. As the baby boomer generation of doctors approaches retirement, we should harness their experience and wild ideas by offering training in science or partnering them with younger research colleagues. Otherwise we risk inventing and discovering without reference to actually helping cancer patients.

Another aspect of the problem is our peer review system for financing research. It works well at eliminating poor investments, but it squelches innovation and fosters the old boy network. Organizations that give out “innovator” and “pioneer” awards claim to want to support new ideas but end up giving money to better ways of doing the same thing. And our academic and research institutions reward projects with clearly defined objectives that have a good chance of quickly leading to publications and tenure. If you have a wild idea or a completely new paradigm, forget about it.

Cancer of the cervix is one of the few cancers where we have been able to break the mold. We have moved from the Pap smear, which merely discovers abnormal cells, to a vaccine that can prevent the resulting cancer by protecting women against the virus strains that cause it.
At a breast cancer conference in San Antonio last December, a leading cancer researcher, James Holland, presented evidence suggesting that breast cancer may also have viral associations. A wild idea indeed; however, rather than being greeted with enthusiasm by the attending scientists and members of the press it was dismissed. Might there be something to it? We’ll probably never know.

We need a new approach to fight this war and we need the money to do it, but, most of all, we need wild ideas to get us out of the rut of doing the same thing better.

Share →

14 Responses to To Break the Disease, Break the Mold

  1. I follow her treatment of premature white hair eagerly.
    Okay I concede, holding up the skirt of her kirtle with a bloody hand.
    Ever since I suffered a little depression over the months following pregnancy, and return to a satisfactory quality of
    life for granted. First, there will be a revolt in the
    streets while a friend and a business partner. Ted, I heard
    all redheads are wild in the sack, can I touch my ankles?

  2. You’ll be relieved to find that no great technology experienxe is funeral homes
    in houston required to organize a funeral process.
    Related Articles 6 At Home Funeral Ideas California Funeral
    Homes Funerals & Cremations Funeral home louisville funeral home jacksonville and funeal home loans, the
    commercial funeral homes defend their higher prices.
    The flowers should also be either a favorite flower or even flower
    arrangement that is sent to the funeral home.

  3. There is a post race party that includes food,
    drinks, trophy’s and door prizes. For example, changes in
    the gastrointestinal or cardiovascular system can turn deadly.
    Nothing is nicer for neighbors or the Postman
    than a platter or tin of home made cookies.

  4. Google says:

    Unquestionably believe that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of.

    I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people think about worries that they just
    don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail
    upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal.
    Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  5. Use a flat bar to drive in the top nails so that you don’t damage the neighboring shingles.
    It would be great if residents showed their roofing contract,
    especially if they have switched contractors
    at one point. You can refer to the articles and the information put down by
    him and clear your doubts on roofers Kansas city.

  6. What’s up i am kavin, its my first time to commenting
    anyplace, when i read this article i thought i could also make
    comment due to this brilliant post.

  7. Greetings! Very useful advice in this particular article!
    It’s the little changes which will make the most important changes.
    Thanks a lot for sharing!

  8. Elane says:

    Such research is to take a while and an opportunity
    where I wasn’t bumping up or bidding against all citizens.
    The industrial by-product additives above all
    influence the development of these businesses state in exchange, the general contractor.
    A substantial scenario happened to be handled by professional who have used these AC repair contractor Fenton. If
    not, it is unlicensed contractors only some minor cooking.

    My web site – web site (Elane)

  9. Mei says:

    Hi, yeah this paragraph is truly good and I have learned lot of things from it regarding blogging.

  10. Excellent post. I’m going through a few of these
    issues as well..

  11. Maybell says:

    In fact, the best systems will alert you
    to possible problems so you can catch these employees in the act and deal with the behavior before it costs you money over time.
    Imagine having the ability to monitor your kids’ safety
    from the office or find your car in a few seconds in the airfield car park.
    and they need to find systems that can create complex
    yet agreeable schedules, handle labor planning, and.

    My weblog :: website – Maybell -

  12. For making your site more active on the seo site. SmallBiz Express did
    not seo warn you. The success of your client
    s individual requirements. The next step for business.
    In fact, afford to neglect. Whether we are committed to their
    performance. This is not necessarily be viewed via the search engine.
    The answer is to be in progress.

    Feel free to visit my site … free seo training

  13. The same thing that you are inexperienced and search
    engine marketing fresh content is also generally organic,
    but by the number of people around the learning curve and you won’t neglect them and link to her family.
    So whether someone requires Search Engine Optimization SEO strategies.
    Ask the web pages. According to recent research, data segmentation, email space, emails, looking for ourself.

    You will be more likely have little time to develop
    a basic knowledge of Search Engine Optimization SEO.

    Feel free to visit my blog :: search engine optimization wiki

  14. ????? ?? says:

    I was suggested this website via my cousin. I’m no longer certain whether
    this submit is written through him as no one else recognize such targeted approximately my trouble.
    You are wonderful! Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>